Mon premier blog

Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code Don Roberts, John Brant, Kent Beck, Martin Fowler, William Opdyke
Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional

Hence, it is correct and useful to detect clones in the code, but refactoring is not .. In my short career I have seen entire systems who should have had a major refactoring. This book is all about refactoring. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code - Martin Fowler. The first place prize will be a copy of Refactoring: Improving The Design Of Existing Code, an Ubuntu Mug, an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS install disc, and a Mun pen. And you can be right saying that I've just read Refactoring: Improving. Beck, “Refactoring: improving the design of existing code”, Addison Wesley Longman, 1999, pp.238 – 240. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. I think people see refactoring as a difficult process. We recently launched a challenge that invites Safari Books Online subscribers to write a book or video review and in exchange for their review, we'll enter. This book should be treated as a classic in software craftmanship, and its contents are still relevant today as they were in 1999. At the same time, as already suggested by Kapser and Godfrey [5], there are several situations where code duplication seems to be a reasonable or even a beneficial design option. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code (Martin Fowler, Kent Beck et al.) – The first couple of chapters are a must read for every developer. Refactoring improving the design of existing code[ebook]. Fowler, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Ma, USA, 1999. The next book I'll probably get, since I have heard good things about it, is “Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code”. Image by seizethedave via Flickr You may say I've been reading a lot recently. I started with the “Clean Code” book by Robert Martin since I was on a limited budget. Design is hard; so improving design of existing code must be hard, as well, right?